|
The
Board acknowledges the need for and continued maintenance of the highest
standards of corporate governance practice and ethical conduct by all
Directors and employees of Michael Hill International Limited and its
subsidiaries. Michael Hill International has earned a reputation as a
leader and an innovator in the area of corporate governance reporting.
The Board endorses
the overall principles embodied in the New Zealand Institute of Directors
Code of Proper Practice for Directors. It has a majority of
non-executive Directors on the Board, to provide balance and a cross section
of skills and experience.
The Board is accountable
for the performance of the Group
The Board is responsible to shareholders for charting the direction of
the Group by participation in the setting of objectives,strategy and key
policy areas. It is then responsible for monitoring managements
running of the business to ensure implementation is in accordance with
the agreed framework. The Board delegates the conduct of the day-to-day
affairs of the Company to the Chief Executive Officer within this framework.
The workings of the Board and its code of conduct are governed by the
Companys constitution and a Board Operations Manual, committed to
by all Directors. This manual sets out all the functions and operating
procedures of the Board, including charters for each sub-committee. The
Board Operations Manual also clearly sets out those matters that only
the Board can make decisions on. These include dividend payments,solvency
certificates, raising new capital, major borrowings, approval of the annual
accounts, provision of information to shareholders, major capital expenditure
and acquisitions.
Each year, the company produces a five year business plan and an operating
budget which are both reviewed and approved by the Board. Financial statements
are prepared monthly and reviewed by the Board progressively through the
year to monitor managements performance against the budget and five
year plan.
Board Membership
The Constitution currently sets the size of the Board at a minimum of
three and a maximum of eight and at least two Directors must be resident
in New Zealand. The Board currently comprises six Directors,comprising
an Executive Chairman,a Chief Executive Officer, and four non-executive
Directors. The Board met on six occasions in the financial year ended
30 June 2003. Profiles of the current Directors appear on page 29 of this
Report. Under the Companys constitution, one half of all Directors
must retire every year,but can be re-elected at an annual meeting if eligible.
Newly appointed Directors must seek re-election at the first annual meeting
of shareholders following their appointment.
The Company has no requirement for Directors to hold shares in the company
but actively encourages them to do so.
Directors
Shareholdings - Refer
Analysis of Shareholding
Directors Meetings
The number of meetings held throughout the past year is detailed below.
The agenda for meetings
is prepared by the Company Secretary in conjunction with the Chairman
and the Chief Executive Officer. Any member of the Board may request the
addition of an item to the agenda. Board papers are circulated to Directors
a week in advance of meetings.
The table below sets
out the Board and sub-committee meetings attended by Directors during
the course of the Financial Year.
| |
Board
of
|
Audit
|
Remuneration
|
| |
Directors
|
Committee
|
Committee
|
| |
Meetings
|
Meetings
|
Meetings
|
Meetings
|
Meetings
|
Meetings
|
| |
Held
|
Attended
|
Held
|
Attended
|
Held
|
Attended
|
| |
| R.M.Hill |
6
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
| M.R.Parsell |
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
| L.W.Peters |
6
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
| G.J.Gwynne |
6
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
| M.R.Doyle |
6
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
| A.C.Hill |
6
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
| |
The
Work of Directors
Non-executive directors
normally spend around 22 days per year on board and sub-committee meetings.
Board meetings are held in different locations in Australia and New Zealand,
and where possible the Board endeavours to visit Michael Hill Jeweller
stores in the area during the course of a meeting in a particular city.
This enables the Directors to keep in touch with the staff at the coalface
and to keep abreast of the latest store designs and shopping mall developments.
Board Review
During the
course of the last financial year,the Board conducted a self assessment
of its performance over the previous 12 months. There were no substantial
changes made to any of the Boards processes as a result of this
review.
Board Committees
The Board has established a number of sub-committees to guide and assist
the Board with overseeing certain aspects of corporate governance
the audit process, determination of compensation issues and the structure
of the Board itself. Each sub-committee is empowered to seek any information
it requires from employees in pursuing its duties and to obtain independent
legal or other professional advice. The provision of such advice, if required,
would be arranged in consultation with the Chairman. In circumstances
where a Director was to obtain separate advice from that obtained on behalf
of the Group, that advice would normally be provided to all Directors.
Audit
Sub-Committee
The Audit sub-committee, which is chaired by Murray Doyle and consists
of Messrs Doyle and Peters, met twice during the year. The function of
the Audit sub-committee is to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities
under the Companies Act 1993 and the Financial Reporting Act 1993, regarding
managements accountancy practices,policies and controls relative
to the Groups financial position and to review and make appropriate
inquiry into the audits of the Groups financial statements by both
internal and external auditors. This responsibility includes advising
on the appointment of the external auditor and reviewing the scope and
quality of the audit. The audit sub-committee has the responsibility of
monitoring the Groups Risk Management practices and procedures.
The Groups auditors,both internal and external,along with other
relevant senior executives,attend all meetings and may discuss any matters
in connection to audits, the Groups risk and control environment
or any other matters relating to the Groups financial and non-financial
affairs.
At least once a year, the Chairman and non-executive Directors on this
Committee meet with the external auditors privately without the presence
of Company executives.
Remuneration Sub-Committee
This sub-committee, chaired by Wayne Peters, comprises all Directors except
Mike Parsell. The function of the Remuneration sub-committee is to determine
the Chief Executives and Senior Executives remuneration. This
role also includes responsibility for share option schemes, incentive
performance packages, and fringe benefit policies. The sub-committee also
advises on proposals for significant company wide remuneration policies
and programs. In carrying out this role, the sub-committee operates independently
of Senior Management of the Company, and obtains independent advice on
the appropriateness of the remuneration packages. The committee met once
during the year.
This sub-committee also has the responsibility to review the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis.
The committee has continued to structure Senior Management bonuses around
a return on capital employed basis, to emphasise efficient use of capital.
Nominations Sub-Committee
This sub-committee, chaired by Michael Hill,consists of the nonexecutive
Directors and Michael Hill. The function of the subcommittee is to make
recommendations to the Board regarding the most appropriate Board structure.
It also advises on the appointment of additional Directors. Board membership
is reviewed periodically to ensure the Board has an appropriate mix of
qualifications, skills and experience. External advisors may be used to
assist this process.
Any person who is to be considered as a Director of the Company must attend
three Board meetings in the capacity of a Consultant before being eligible
for appointment as a Director.
Share
Trading by Directors
The Board Operations Manual sets out a procedure which must be followed
by Directors when trading in Michael Hill International shares. Directors
must notify and obtain the approval of the Company before trading in MHI
shares and are only permitted to trade in two window periods. The window
periods commence at the time the half yearly or yearly results are announced
and expire five months after the end of the financial year or four months
after the end of the half yearly accounting period of the company, as
the case may be.
The Directors named below have disclosed to the Board under Section 148
of the Companies Act 1993, particulars of the following acquisitions or
dispositions of relevant interests in the ordinary shares of the company
during the year. The relevant interest acquired or disposed of includes
beneficial ownership.
| |
No.of
shares acquired or (disposed of)
|
Consideration
paid or (received)
|
Date
of acquisition or (disposal)
|
| L.W.Peters |
211,534
|
$923,619
|
26/03/03
|
| |
191,001
|
$838,895
|
30/04/03
|
| R.M.Hill |
(1,000,000)
|
($5,800,000)
|
27/11/02
|
Conflicts
of Interests
The Board Operations Manual sets out a procedure to be followed where
Directors are faced with a conflict of interest. At all times a Director
must be able to act in the interests of the organisation as a whole. The
interests of associates,individual shareholders and the personal interests
of the Director and his family must not be allowed to prevail over those
of the Company and its shareholders generally.
Non-Executive Directors
Fees
Fees for non-executive directors are based on the nature of their work
and their responsibilities. Over the past five years the company has become
a truly Australasian company with 65% of the Groups stores in Australia.
Accordingly, the fees for non-executive Directors have been set at approximately
the average of the mean level of base directors fees for New Zealand and
Australian Directors of publicly listed companies. Research two years
ago carried out by Korn Ferry and available to the Board,indicated these
averages were approximately NZ$34,000 and A$53,000, before taking into
account any extra fees for participation on Board sub-committees. Shareholders
at the Annual Meeting in November 2001 approved a maximum amount of $215,000
to be paid to Directors. Each NZ resident Director is currently paid $50,000
per annum and our Australian resident Director A$50,000 per annum.
No equity incentives are offered to non-executive Directors.
A resolution is being put to the Annual Meeting on 7 November 2003 to
alter the Companys Constitution relating to the payment of retirement
allowances for Directors. Under the proposed change, no retirement allowances
will be payable to Directors unless they are first approved by an ordinary
resolution of shareholders.
Share
Purchase Scheme
The Company
has a Share Purchase Scheme for management in operation.
The scheme was designed
to encourage Store Managers,Regional Managers and other senior employees
of the Company to purchase shares in the Company. In order to provide
a pool of shares for eligible employees to purchase, the Company from
time to time will buy Michael Hill International shares on the New Zealand
Stock Exchange. In the year ended 30 June 2003, the Company purchased
80,000 shares on market at an average acquisition price of $5.30 per share.
These shares were purchased during the window periods available for Directors
to deal in shares of Michael Hill International.
On the 4th of April
2003, the Company sold 27,810 shares to 22 employees of the company. The
rules of the scheme provide for the Company to on sell shares to purchasing
employees at a 10% discount to the weighted average price for the ordinary
shares during the 10 working day period ending 2 working days immediately
prior to the date on which the Company offers shares to the employees.
The discount is deemed to be financial assistance under the
Companies Act 1993. The total discount relating to this issue of shares
was $12,236. After taking the discount into account, the purchasing employees
paid $112,391 for the shares which was equivalent to an average acquisition
price of $4.04 per share.
The Trustees of the
scheme hold the shares for a restrictive period of one year, which is
to promote the concept of encouraging long-term investing in the Company.
The balance of shares purchased amounting to 139,438 shares are held as
Treasury Stock and will be used for the next issue of shares
under the scheme in February 2004.
Share Options
On the 22nd August
2002, the Directors issued a further 200,000 options to two senior management
personnel in the Company, including 100,000 to Emma Hill in her capacity
of General Manager, Canada. The issue of options for Emma Hill was subject
to the approval of shareholders at the annual meeting on the 28th November
2002, as she was deemed a related party in terms of the New
Zealand Stock Exchange listing rules. The resolution approving the options
for Emma Hill was passed.
Further information
on options outstanding to employees are included in note 5 to the Financial
Statements on page 40.
Communication with
Shareholders
Michael Hill International
places high importance on communication with shareholders. A half year
and annual report is published each year and posted on the MHI website.
Announcements to the New Zealand Stock Exchange and the media are also
posted on the website as are copies of presentations to Analysts which
are done once a year in conjunction with the release of the annual results
for the year.
The
Company Secretary takes primary responsibility for communications with
the New Zealand Stock Exchange in relation to listing rule obligations
and disclosure obligations.
Shareholders may raise
matters for discussion at Annual meetings and have the ultimate control
in corporate governance by voting Directors on or off the Board.
Continuous disclosure
Policy
With the introduction
of the new NZX continuous disclosure rules from December 2002,the Board
has adopted the following procedure:
- At each Board
meeting, a standard agenda item is now considered - Does the Company
have anything to disclose? The Board considers the information
in its possession and decides appropriately whether any information
needs to be disclosed to the market.
- Between Board
meetings,management will bring to the attention of the Directors any
information they believe should be disclosed to the market for their
consideration.
- The Company will
now disclose revenue figures for the group on a quarterly basis to the
market. Since the introduction of the Continuous Disclosure rules,the
Board has made the following disclosures to the market: 21 January 2003
Release of sales figures for the six months ended 31 December 2002.
12 February 2003
Notice to the market advising of approximate operating profit for
the six months ended 31 December 2002.
26 February 2003
Preliminary half year profit announcement to the NZX.
10 April 2003
Announcement to the NZSE - full year operating profit forecast revision
to between $9.5 million and $10.5 million.
5 May 2003 Release
of sales figures for nine months ended 31 March 2003.
14 May 2003 Correction
to sales figure announcement for nine months ended 31 March 2003.
14 August 2003
Preliminary audited profit announcement to the NZX for the year ended
30 June 2003.
Operating profit announced
of $10,244,000. The Company believes it has complied with the NZX continuous
disclosure rules.
External Audit
Independence Policy
The Group has adopted
the following policy to ensure that audit independence is maintained,
both in fact and appearance, such that Michael Hill Internationals
external financial reporting is viewed as being highly reliable and credible.
The policy covers
the following areas:
- Provision
of non audit services by the external auditors.
- Fees
and billings by the auditors
- Hiring
of staff from the audit firm
Provision of non
audit services by the external auditing firm
Our external auditing
firm should not undertake any role not permitted under IFAC (International
Federation of Accountants) regulations regarding independence of auditors.
Under the IFAC guidelines, the table below sets out the type of non audit
work that Michael Hill International will allow its external auditing
firm to perform.
BOOKKEEPING
Prohibited, other
than in emergency situations. Managerial decision making prohibited.
VALUATIONS
Prohibited.
TAX SERVICES
Permitted, as not
seen to threaten independence
PROVISION OF IT SYSTEMS
Design and implementation
of financial IT systems prohibited.
STAFF SECONDMENT FROM AUDITORS
These are permitted with safeguards. No management decision making.
Signing agreements or discretionary authority to commit MHI is not allowed.
LITIGATION SUPPORT
SERVICES
Permitted with safeguards.
LEGAL SERVICES
Permitted
where immaterial to the financial statements.
EXECUTIVE SEARCH AND SELECTION
Permitted with safeguards.
Making selection for MHI prohibited.
CORPORATE FINANCE
Permitted with safeguards. Promoting, dealing in or underwriting MHI
Securities prohibited.
The safeguards put
in place will be specific to the circumstances of each case. The general
rule to be applied is whether an independent third party would consider
the safeguards reasonable.
Fees and Billings
All audit and non audit fees to be reported to the Audit committee annually.
Non audit fees greater than $25,000 should be reviewed by the Group Company
Secretary and reported to the Audit committee for approval. (For the 2002/03
financial year audit fees amounting to $176,000 and fees for taxation
compliance amounting to $320,000 were paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers.)
Hiring of Staff
from the External Auditing Firm
The hiring by Michael
Hill Jeweller of any partner or audit manager must first be approved by
the Chairman of the Audit committee. There are no other restrictions on
the hiring of staff from the audit firm.
Michael Hill International
is committed to the management of risk throughout its operations in order
to protect our employees,assets,earnings,and reputation.
Risk Management
Process
The Board of Directors
are responsible for Risk Management
which starts each year as part of the annual strategic planning process.
Risks and opportunities are reviewed and business projects formalised.
The status of business projects, and associated risk,are discussed as
part of the Boards regular meeting schedule throughout the year.
At management level, the status of business projects, and associated risk,
are discussed as part of the Group Managers regular meeting schedule
throughout the year.
Business Continuity
Planning
The Group has a comprehensive
Business Continuity Plan in effect for all operations. The plan is flexible
and can be used to handle a wide range of crisis situations that could
arise in the course of business conducted by our company.
Insurance Programme
The Group has a comprehensive
insurance programme which supports the Risk Management process. Insurance
needs and coverage are scrutinised annually to ensure the Companys
risk profile and exposure is at an appropriate level.
Internal Audit
The Group has an Internal
Audit function that regularly reviews and evaluates the safeguarding of
assets, compliance with company policies, reliability and integrity of
information, effectiveness of internal controls, and the economical and
efficient use of resources. The internal auditors regularly report on
their findings to the Audit Sub-Committee of the Board of Directors and
have direct access to the Audit Sub-Committee members at all times.
Code of Conduct
Our Board of Directors
believes that good risk management is supported by the highest standards
of corporate behaviour towards our employees, customers, and other stakeholders.
The Code of Conduct is a guide to help our Directors and employees live
up to our high ethical standards. The Code is comprehensive and covers
our roles with employees, customers, business partners, shareholders,
communities, and governments.
|
REVIEW
STATEMENT TO THE MEMBERS OF MICHAEL HILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
|
| We
have reviewed the information contained in the Corporate Governance
and Risk Management Statements for the year ended 30 June 2003. Our
review was made in accordance with the Review Engagement Statement
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New
Zealand.
Directors
Responsibilities
The Corporate
Governance and Risk Management Statements are the responsibility
of, and have been approved by the Directors.
Reviewers
Responsibilities
We have been
engaged to carry out a review engagement to verify the information
contained in the Corporate Governance and Risk Management Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2003.
Basis of
Review
The review consisted
of enquiry, analysis and discussion of information provided to us
by Michael Hill International Limited. Our review included visits
to Head Office where we:
- conducted
interviews with management and staff
- obtained
information regarding the basis of preparation of the information;
and
- performed
reviews of corporate records and other relevant source documentation.
A review does
not constitute an audit and consequently we do not express an audit
opinion.
Review Findings
Based on our
review,nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe
that the information contained in the accompanying Corporate Governance
and Risk Management Statements have not been properly compiled and
fairly presented, in all material respects.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Chartered Accountants
Auckland, New Zealand
14 August 2003
|

|